Thursday, May 2, 2013

The Boston Bombing was a False Flag - Why aren't we talking about this?

I can't tell you how tired I am of people ignoring the obvious. I also can't tell you  how tired I am of looking at the news and seeing how quickly people create a saint-like shroud around events with their instant memorials for the dead. People aren't even in the ground yet before there are hundreds of memorials and talk of "moving on" and getting justice.

Then there are the feel-good, heart-wrenching tales of heroics and surveyors. We see the image they want us to see and hear the stories they want us to hear, all the while those that raise ANY questions are seen as defiling the dead and undermining the hard work of the emergency people ... on and on.

Let's be real for a moment. There are many inconsistencies surrounding the Boston bombing, just as there is with Sandy Hook, just like there was with the theater shooting in Colorado. Things do not add up. It's not a conspiracy, it's not crazy-talk and it's not speaking ill of the dead and hurt to say that we are being lied to. It is willful ignorance to ignore these inconsistencies.

Here are some of the many inconsistencies involving the Boston Bombing, look, verify and start questioning the official story

  • The Boston Globe shows a bombing drill by DHS at the time of the bombing
  • The initial report is there were three bombs that went off from a US intel officer
  • A new report is issued that there were two bombs that went off @ 2:50pm and two others that didn't go off.
  • A little more than an hour later, a third bomb went off at the JFK Library.
  • Cellphone service was shut down in the Boston area to prevent any possible remote detonations of explosives, a law enforcement official said. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation was ongoing.
  • Coach Stevenson finished the marathon and reports that he noticed bomb sniffing dogs. This is prior to the bomb going off, but when the bomb does go off a voice over loud speakers state to not panic, it is a drill.
  • As the Boston Globe tweeted today, “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.”
  •  Bloomberg news is now saying, “This is very likely a terrorist attack.”
  •  The Federal Aviation Administration barred low-flying aircraft from within 3.5 miles of the
  • Investigators had a suspect, a Saudi Arabian national. Additionally  the Boston police have surveillance video of someone bringing multiple backpacks to blast site.
  • A Federal law-enforcement source confirmed that at least 12 are dead and 50 are injured. Massachusetts General Hospital was treating 10 people with amputated limbs and all operating rooms were on hold.
  • Authorities have a identified a suspect, a Saudi national, who is currently being guarded in a Boston hospital with shrapnel wounds.
  •  Law-enforcement sources said at least the first explosion occurred in the lobby of a nearby hotel.
  •  "Fire in building is out, appears to have started in the mechanical room of new building," The JFK Library's Twitter account read. "All staff and visitors are accounted for and safe."
  •  Also cops issued an all-points-bulletin for a yellow Penske truck or van that tried to get access to a marathon site, claiming it had medical supplies and then sped off or was turned away

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Monsanto Protection Act & Back Room Washington Deals

Unless your living under a rock you've heard about the uproar over the Monsanto Protection Act. This piece of legislation, which is the popular name given to HR 933, was supposed to be a spending bill aimed at averting the government shut down. However, in typical Washington D.C. style, last minute, under the radar, and backroom deals, Section 735 was added.

Section 735 is a sneaky and malevolent segment of this bill aimed at giving companies that produce GMO seeds a free pass. They can produce, sell and plant these crops, regardless of the questions that remain over the safety of  genetically modified foods. This offers them a basic immunity from the repercussions we all experience due to their products.

Just as a side note, can you think of any other product in which the manufacturers are granted legal immunity from the dangers of what they produce? They have to label curling irons to guard against lawsuits from misuse, but Bio-tech Agricultural companies can flood the market with dangerous, unproven genetically modified foods.

Sound right to you?

What most people aren't talking about here is the fact that this Section of HR 933 contains a sunset clause, setting it up to expire in 6 months. You have to imagine that there is a reason that this was put in place, especially in the face of the ire against the Monsanto Protection Act. Do they have wind of an upcoming lawsuit? Are we on the verge of an official revelation about the dangerous impact these GMO crops have had?

We're not sure, but we're investigating and suggest you do the same. Tell us your thoughts on HR 933 and how do you plan to oppose this violation of your rights?

Sunday, February 17, 2013

What happened over Russia?

In the past week we've seen some spectacular events in our skies. It started when news came in about a meteor strike in Russia that injured nearly a thousand people, destroyed property around the city of Chelyabinsk. Within a matter of hours fireballs were Northern California and Cuba as well.

Now, upon second thought, experts are saying that the meteor in Russia, which culminated in a fireball, loud blast and widespread damage, was the equivalent of a nearly 500 kilotons of TNT. That puts it at 30 times the power o the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Think about that for a moment..... this was a meteor?

If you recall a bit of history you might remember that Russia was host to another amazing meteor event back in 1908. This event has been the center of conspiracies and debate, with people unsure exactly what happened. On the table has been a collision with a black hole or some sort of natural atomic explosion.

Whatever it was, it knocked down 80 million trees over 830 square miles. This current event, also in Russia, is being described as being nearly 30 times the power of  the Hiroshima atomic bomb. This is estimated based off of sensor information gathered from around the world, including in Alaska, which registered the event.

Hours later a fireball streaked across the sky in California's Bay Area and similarly, another one in the skies above Cuba. Sound odd? If you think so, you're not the only one.Leaders in Russia have claimed that this wasn't an act of nature, but rather a U.S. test over their airspace. They have deployed thousands of military to help with the clean up.

At this point, I'm not sure what to think. Could these three events be related in that one is the meteor and the other are pieces of it that broke off and fell to earth? That seems possible but nobody seems to be making that claim. It does seem odd that we've had nothing like this happen in modern history and all of a sudden three events occur

The magnitude of the event in Russia also seems difficult to fathom. 30 times the power of Hiroshima? Doesn't that seem like something big enough that we'd have had some type of heads up before it hit Earth? That alone is an entirely different problem.

What do you think? What hit Russia? We'd love to hear your comments below.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Fillings Harm Children- New Study Reveals

Parents and activists have been talking about the dangers of things like vaccines and fillings for a long time. It seems that science is starting to catch up with what that real-world practical experience has been telling the rest of us for a long time... at least when it comes to fillings.

A new study published in American Academy of Pediatrics and conducted by Maserejian and Trachtenberg found that BPA, which is widely used in fillings, creates behavioral and social problems in children. The study compared children who were given alternatives and those who were given the standard fillings which contain BPA.

What they found was that in these children, who ranged from 6-10 years old, those with BPA fillings had behavioral and social problems in the five years after they received them. This includes depression, anxiety, acting out, self-esteem and other issues.

The fillings in question are a type of composite filling. These have become very popular because they can be the same color as the surrounding teeth. A popular resin used in these feelings has some BPA in it, the same chemical that has been banned from baby bottles and sippy cups. BPA mimics estrogen and has been linked to serious problems.

Of course they will continue to say there is nothing to worry about. They'll roll out the standard excuses, saying the exposure is so small as to be inconsequential. However, how many "inconsequential" exposures do we need before they add up to real health problems?