Monsanto Protection Act & Back Room Washington Deals

Unless your living under a rock you've heard about the uproar over the Monsanto Protection Act. This piece of legislation, which is the popular name given to HR 933, was supposed to be a spending bill aimed at averting the government shut down. However, in typical Washington D.C. style, last minute, under the radar, and backroom deals, Section 735 was added.

Section 735 is a sneaky and malevolent segment of this bill aimed at giving companies that produce GMO seeds a free pass. They can produce, sell and plant these crops, regardless of the questions that remain over the safety of  genetically modified foods. This offers them a basic immunity from the repercussions we all experience due to their products.

Just as a side note, can you think of any other product in which the manufacturers are granted legal immunity from the dangers of what they produce? They have to label curling irons to guard against lawsuits from misuse, but Bio-tech Agricultural companies can flood the market with dangerous, unproven genetically modified foods.

Sound right to you?

What most people aren't talking about here is the fact that this Section of HR 933 contains a sunset clause, setting it up to expire in 6 months. You have to imagine that there is a reason that this was put in place, especially in the face of the ire against the Monsanto Protection Act. Do they have wind of an upcoming lawsuit? Are we on the verge of an official revelation about the dangerous impact these GMO crops have had?

We're not sure, but we're investigating and suggest you do the same. Tell us your thoughts on HR 933 and how do you plan to oppose this violation of your rights?

What happened over Russia?

In the past week we've seen some spectacular events in our skies. It started when news came in about a meteor strike in Russia that injured nearly a thousand people, destroyed property around the city of Chelyabinsk. Within a matter of hours fireballs were Northern California and Cuba as well.

Now, upon second thought, experts are saying that the meteor in Russia, which culminated in a fireball, loud blast and widespread damage, was the equivalent of a nearly 500 kilotons of TNT. That puts it at 30 times the power o the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Think about that for a moment..... this was a meteor?

If you recall a bit of history you might remember that Russia was host to another amazing meteor event back in 1908. This event has been the center of conspiracies and debate, with people unsure exactly what happened. On the table has been a collision with a black hole or some sort of natural atomic explosion.

Whatever it was, it knocked down 80 million trees over 830 square miles. This current event, also in Russia, is being described as being nearly 30 times the power of  the Hiroshima atomic bomb. This is estimated based off of sensor information gathered from around the world, including in Alaska, which registered the event.

Hours later a fireball streaked across the sky in California's Bay Area and similarly, another one in the skies above Cuba. Sound odd? If you think so, you're not the only one.Leaders in Russia have claimed that this wasn't an act of nature, but rather a U.S. test over their airspace. They have deployed thousands of military to help with the clean up.

At this point, I'm not sure what to think. Could these three events be related in that one is the meteor and the other are pieces of it that broke off and fell to earth? That seems possible but nobody seems to be making that claim. It does seem odd that we've had nothing like this happen in modern history and all of a sudden three events occur

The magnitude of the event in Russia also seems difficult to fathom. 30 times the power of Hiroshima? Doesn't that seem like something big enough that we'd have had some type of heads up before it hit Earth? That alone is an entirely different problem.

What do you think? What hit Russia? We'd love to hear your comments below.

Fillings Harm Children- New Study Reveals

Parents and activists have been talking about the dangers of things like vaccines and fillings for a long time. It seems that science is starting to catch up with what that real-world practical experience has been telling the rest of us for a long time... at least when it comes to fillings.

A new study published in American Academy of Pediatrics and conducted by Maserejian and Trachtenberg found that BPA, which is widely used in fillings, creates behavioral and social problems in children. The study compared children who were given alternatives and those who were given the standard fillings which contain BPA.

What they found was that in these children, who ranged from 6-10 years old, those with BPA fillings had behavioral and social problems in the five years after they received them. This includes depression, anxiety, acting out, self-esteem and other issues.

The fillings in question are a type of composite filling. These have become very popular because they can be the same color as the surrounding teeth. A popular resin used in these feelings has some BPA in it, the same chemical that has been banned from baby bottles and sippy cups. BPA mimics estrogen and has been linked to serious problems.

Of course they will continue to say there is nothing to worry about. They'll roll out the standard excuses, saying the exposure is so small as to be inconsequential. However, how many "inconsequential" exposures do we need before they add up to real health problems?

California Working Against Parental Rights

Parents are concerned about vaccines and the damage they cause to children.  Many people do not think that it is a coincidence that autism, which used to be rare, is now something that touches nearly everyone's life. Think about it.... if you are over 30, did you grow up knowing anybody with Autism? Now, how many people do you know affected by it?

So, for this reason people are starting to question vaccines. Parents are opting out of vaccine programs and using legal loopholes to do so. See, public schools require vaccinations and allow only a few limited reasons for exemptions. California is seeking to make it even harder, if not impossible, to opt out of vaccine programs.

This is a frightening path headed straight towards forced vaccinations. Read the full story by following this link.