Pittsburgh Police Use Gas Against Protesters

Pittsburgh Police use pepper spray and smoke to suppress a group of around 300 protesters at the G20 summit. Most of the members of the protest group were from Free Tibet. Others, however, were there to protest the job situation. Pittsburgh has a long history of unemployment and loosing jobs as the steel and other local industries faced rapid decline.

The police being used for security come from around the country, from as far away as 2100 miles. Using non-local police is a tactic employed to make the Police more accepting of using violence upon citizens. After all, it is harder to use violence on your neighbors than it would be to use it on strangers in a far away city.

I say we all contact the Pittsburgh Police Department and tell them it is unacceptable to use violence against unarmed demonstrators.

Here is a link to the Pittsburgh Police Department Feedback form:

http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/police/html/feedback.html

And here is their address and number, feel free to contact them and let them know the world is watching!

Police Bureau 1203 Western AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15233Phone: 412-323-7800

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/g20-summit/6229141/G20-Pittsburgh-police-fire-tear-gas-at-protestors.html

Real Terror or Real Government Conspiracy?

Federal officials have arrested terror suspect,Hosan Maher Husein Smadi, in Dallas, Texas. In the country illegally, Smadi had been living in the Dallas area for some time. They say he was planning to bomb a local skyscraper and that he had previously tried to set off a vehicle-based explosive at the base of the 60-story Fountain Place tower.

Authorities claim that they have been watching Smadi for some time, following his violent posts on the extremist chat sites. Articles we've been watching claim that officials did have court affidavits to spy on Smadi, but no information have been released on what information they presented to court in order to get the affidavits.

What we are curious about is if this has happened at all, or if the government is hoping to continue ramping up fears so that we all walk a little more closely in line. After all, remember Tom Ridge, previous Homeland Security Chief Tom Ridge, admits that he raised the terror alert for political reasons. He claims that George W. Bush pressured him to raise the "terror alert" level to influence the November 2004 US election.

Now that we know this, the powers-that-be know that it will take more than them just changing the national alert level to get us to sign away more rights and ignore what is happening on the world scene.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/09/25/texas.terror.arrest/index.html

They Claim Handwashing Isn't That Helpful with Preventing H1N1

There are many reports that people are resistant and reluctant to the H1N1 vaccine. We have reported about experts and health care workers all saying they will not take the vaccine. So, it was only a matter of time before the powers that be come out with stories and claims to try and scare us all into standing in line for a vaccine.

Now CDC and WHO experts are saying that washing your hands isn't really that effective in stopping or reducing its spread. They say that even if you wash your hands, somebody could sneeze on you, and you'll get ill that way. But, honestly, isn't that the case with just about every communicable disease?

In truth, they are trying to get us all to do what they want, which is to take the unproven, untested and dangerous vaccine. I wont, hopefully you won't as well.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/09/24/hand.washing.helpful/index.html

Worlds Largest HIV Vaccine Trial

It is the largest HIV vaccine trial ever to be conducted. Right now researchers are involved in a study with over 16,000 participants in Thailand. The vaccine study comes after initial results show that people receiving a series of shots, including a primary vaccine and a booster vaccine, were 31 percent less likely to get HIV, compared to those given a placebo.

While reading about this I began to wonder, how did they know that these participants were 31 percent less likely to get HIV? I mean, did they follow them for years at a time, logging their risky behavior, and test them for HIV every so often? We all know that isn't what they are doing and in reality how can you see if a test subject is less likely to get HIV? One answer, an insidious one, is that they give them the vaccine then expose them to HIV. This would give them results and if I were a betting person, I'd place my money on this scenario.

Read the article, keep your eyes open for more news, and question everything.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/09/24/hiv.vaccine/index.html