 |
| My own image of chem-trails |
To the informed, these are called chem-trails, because they are not simple condensation, like your run-of-the-mill contrail left by high-flying aircraft.
These are trails coming from the wings of generally unmarked planes at various altitudes from low to as high as commercial air traffic.
These chem-trails are sprayed across the sky and linger for hours on end, often dispersing and creating cloud cover on an otherwise cloud free day.
If you've been following this story for as long as we have, you'll have plenty of stories of chem-trails making people sick. I was listening to an old Art Bell show 15 years ago when a caller from Alaska called and said planes were spraying above them for a week or so. That they had created a checkerboard pattern in the sky and that now his wife and neighbors were sick.
If you said something about this a decade ago people would call you crazy. These days more and more people are growing concerned or at least curious!
What are these chem-trails & why are they there? Is the government spraying us?
We don't know exactly what they are, although many people have working theories and are trying to get to the bottom of it. We'll talk more about that later, what I want to talk about now is the law that allows our government to experiment on us at will.
For people that don't believe that the government would do anything to harm us, or use us as an extra-large petri dish so they can test any number of things, think again. Our government has provided itself a large loophole, legally speaking, allowing them to test on us.
Here is the actual language from Public Law 105-85, as shown on Cornell's Law website:
a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—
(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
What this says is that anything the government declares to be for a peaceful purpose, related to research or is related to some program to see what protects people from certain things like chemicals and bio-agents can be tested on us. This slippery slope means that they can do whatever they wish in terms of experimenting on us because everything is "research related" or for "law enforcement" or for national defense.
Now, while there is a single sentence there on needing informed consent, it's a ruse. The fact that this is part of Public Law means anybody that wants to see it, can see it. You're access to it means you've been informed. It's like the 20 page phone contract that you never get through or the small print that says the really important stuff.
They are telling us they have the right to use us anyway they see fit. If you think they don't use this legal caveat, you're just willfully ignorant. If they didn't intend to use it, it wouldn't be there. And, I'd like to point out, that the government has been caught testing on us many times through the years.
In fact, I'd like to point out that the government finally admitted to putting aerosol sprayers in poor parts of St.Louis in the 50's and 60's and spraying cadmium all over unknowing people. People got sick, died of cancer and the government has not been accountable for any of it. Currently, we have evidence cadmium, aluminum and even pathogens in chem-trails.
Coincidence? We don't think so and I bet you don't either.
Read this law on Cornell's own website here.
Read our piece showing released documents from the St. Louis aerosol experiments here.
No comments:
Post a Comment